Currently in snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0 during interrupt,
we consider there were double acknowledged interrupts when:
1. HW reported pointer is smaller than expected, and
2. Time from last update time (hdelta) is over half a buffer time.
However, when HW reported pointer is only a few bytes smaller than
expected, and when hdelta is just a little larger than half a buffer time
(e.g. ping-pong buffer), it wrongly treats this IRQ as double acknowledged.
The condition #2 uses jiffies, but jiffies is not high resolution
since it is integer. We should consider jiffies inaccuracy.
Signed-off-by: Koro Chen <koro.c...@mediatek.com>
---
sound/core/pcm_lib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
index ac6b33f..7d45645 100644
--- a/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
+++ b/sound/core/pcm_lib.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0(struct snd_pcm_substream
*substream,
if (delta > new_hw_ptr) {
/* check for double acknowledged interrupts */
hdelta = curr_jiffies - runtime->hw_ptr_jiffies;
- if (hdelta > runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies/2) {
+ if (hdelta > runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies/2 + 1) {
hw_base += runtime->buffer_size;
if (hw_base >= runtime->boundary) {
hw_base = 0;
--
1.8.1.1.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
