On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 18:11 +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Prepare the device tree for adding more boards based on Juno r0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno-base.dtsi | 125
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/juno.dts | 122 +-------------------------------
What criteria were used to select the contents of juno-base.dtsi?
>From what I can see, the stuff left out of base is still the same for r0
and r1 (cpu, pmu, memory, psci!). And so juno-r1.dts could just be
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
#include "juno.dts"
/ {
model = "ARM Juno development board (r1)";
};
&memtimer {
status = "okay";
};
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it's a bit hacky, but avoids duplication of source code.
I can only assume there are come non-public differences between r0 and
r1?
--
Tixy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
