memory_failure() is supposed not to handle thp itself, but to split it. But
if something were wrong and page_action() were called on thp, me_huge_page()
(action routine for hugepages) should be better to take no action, rather
than to take wrong action prepared for hugetlb (which triggers BUG_ON().)

This change is for potential problems, but makes sense to me because thp is
an actively developing feature and this code path can be open in the future.

Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git v4.1-rc3.orig/mm/memory-failure.c v4.1-rc3/mm/memory-failure.c
index 5e7795079c58..0e15fd39636a 100644
--- v4.1-rc3.orig/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ v4.1-rc3/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -743,6 +743,10 @@ static int me_huge_page(struct page *p, unsigned long pfn)
 {
        int res = 0;
        struct page *hpage = compound_head(p);
+
+       if (!PageHuge(hpage))
+               return MF_DELAYED;
+
        /*
         * We can safely recover from error on free or reserved (i.e.
         * not in-use) hugepage by dequeuing it from freelist.
-- 
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to