With a cross-compiler based on gcc-4.9, I see warnings like the following:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c: In function
'mlx4_SW2HW_CQ_wrapper':
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c:3048:10: error: 'cq'
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
cq->mtt = mtt;
I think the warning is spurious because we only use cq when
cq_res_start_move_to() returns zero, and it always initializes *cq in that
case. The srq case is similar. But maybe gcc isn't smart enough to figure
that out.
Initialize cq and srq explicitly to avoid the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
index c7f28bf..cdd32f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c
@@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ int mlx4_SW2HW_CQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
int cqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
struct mlx4_cq_context *cqc = inbox->buf;
int mtt_base = cq_get_mtt_addr(cqc) / dev->caps.mtt_entry_sz;
- struct res_cq *cq;
+ struct res_cq *cq = NULL;
struct res_mtt *mtt;
err = cq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, cqn, RES_CQ_HW, &cq);
@@ -3223,7 +3223,7 @@ int mlx4_HW2SW_CQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
{
int err;
int cqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
- struct res_cq *cq;
+ struct res_cq *cq = NULL;
err = cq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, cqn, RES_CQ_ALLOCATED, &cq);
if (err)
@@ -3362,7 +3362,7 @@ int mlx4_SW2HW_SRQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int
slave,
int err;
int srqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
struct res_mtt *mtt;
- struct res_srq *srq;
+ struct res_srq *srq = NULL;
struct mlx4_srq_context *srqc = inbox->buf;
int mtt_base = srq_get_mtt_addr(srqc) / dev->caps.mtt_entry_sz;
@@ -3406,7 +3406,7 @@ int mlx4_HW2SW_SRQ_wrapper(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int
slave,
{
int err;
int srqn = vhcr->in_modifier;
- struct res_srq *srq;
+ struct res_srq *srq = NULL;
err = srq_res_start_move_to(dev, slave, srqn, RES_SRQ_ALLOCATED, &srq);
if (err)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
