On Monday, April 27, 2015 03:56:18 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27 April 2015 at 15:21, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> wrote:
> > The actual frequency is set through "clk_change_rate" which is void
> > function. If the underlying hardware fails and returns error, the error
> > is lost in the clk layer. In order to track such failures, we need to
> > read back the frequency(just the cached value as clk_recalc called after
> > clk->ops->set_rate gets the frequency)
> >
> > This patch adds check to see if the frequency is set correctly or if
> > they were any hardware failures and sends the appropriate errors to the
> > cpufreq core.
> >
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Turquette <mike.turque...@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c 
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > index e1a6ba66a7f5..f65e19f340d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > @@ -186,6 +186,15 @@ bL_cpufreq_set_rate(u32 cpu, u32 old_cluster, u32 
> > new_cluster, u32 rate)
> >                 mutex_unlock(&cluster_lock[old_cluster]);
> >         }
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * FIXME: clk_set_rate has to handle the case where clk_change_rate
> > +        * can fail due to hardware or firmware issues. Until the clk core
> > +        * layer is fixed, we can check here. In most of the cases we will
> > +        * be reading only the cached value anyway. This needs to  be 
> > removed
> > +        * once clk core is fixed.
> > +        */
> > +       if (bL_cpufreq_get_rate(cpu) != new_rate)
> > +               return -EIO;
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>

Both queued up for 4.2, thanks!


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to