On 2015-05-15 12:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2015, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> -    irq_chip_unmask_parent(data);
>> +    if (parent->chip->irq_enable)
>> +            parent->chip->irq_enable(parent);
>> +    else
>> +            parent->chip->irq_unmask(parent);
> 
> Why are you not creating irq_chip_enable_parent() which would have
> been the proper function anyway?
> 

Will add that...

Btw, have you had a chance to look at 1/12? I added a helper there too
to allow make use of generic chip with IRQ domain hierarchy. In case you
are fine with that general appraoch I will send an updated version of
the patchset with the irq_chip_enable_parent helper soon. 

--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to