On 05/13/2015 08:55 AM, Chen Gang wrote: > On 05/12/2015 10:29 PM, Dave Jones wrote: >> likewise sys_bpf judging by the absence of bpf_int_jit_compile and friends >> in arch/alpha >> The weak symbols mean it probably compiles/links, but it doesn't actually do >> anything, and now instead of -ENOSYS, anyone trying to actually use that >> syscall >> on alpha will get weird results. >> >> Shutting up warnings like this strikes me as the wrong thing to do. >> > > It sounds reasonable. For me, we need to wire up implemented syscalls, > and still left the unimplemented syscalls as building warnings. > > If no any additional reply, I shall try to send patch v2 for it within > this week (2015-05-17). >
Sorry for sending patch v2 late (I sent it today just now). The reason is I could not login to hotmail and gmail server at home during the last week end (although the network is OK for other website). Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
