On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:30:22AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > When perf detects data file has index table, process header part first > and then rest data files in a row. Note that the indexed sample data is > recorded for each cpu/thread separately, it's already ordered with > respect to themselves so no need to use the ordered event queue > interface. > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> > --- > tools/perf/perf.c | 1 + > tools/perf/perf.h | 2 ++ > tools/perf/util/session.c | 55 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c > index b857fcbd00cf..960942d9a0b7 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/perf.c > +++ b/tools/perf/perf.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ const char perf_more_info_string[] = > int use_browser = -1; > static int use_pager = -1; > const char *input_name; > +bool perf_has_index;
I probably missed some discussion here, but why is this not perf_session function? I saw some non session related functions further in the patchset using this.. is that the reason? it seems fairly perf_session specific.. might be worth to keep it there? just asking ;-) jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
