On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:22:39AM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > index c30f9819786b..f1894daa79ee 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > @@ -566,19 +566,24 @@ void native_set_fixmap(enum fixed_addresses idx,
> > phys_addr_t phys,
> > /**
> > * pud_set_huge - setup kernel PUD mapping
> > *
> > - * MTRR can override PAT memory types with 4KiB granularity. Therefore,
> > - * this function does not set up a huge page when the range is covered
> > - * by a non-WB type of MTRR. MTRR_TYPE_INVALID indicates that MTRR are
> > - * disabled.
> > + * MTRRs can override PAT memory types with 4KiB granularity. Therefore,
> > + * this function sets up a huge page only if all of the following
> > + * conditions are met:
>
> It should be "if any of the following condition is met". Or, does NOT
> setup if all of ...
>
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are disabled.
> > + * - The range is mapped uniformly by an MTRR, i.e. the range is
> > + * fully covered by a single MTRR entry or the default type.
> > + * - The MTRR memory type is WB.
Hmm, ok, so this is kinda like "any" but they also depend on each other.
So it is
If
- MTRRs are disabled
or
- MTRRs are enabled and the range is completely covered by a single MTRR
or
- MTRRs are enabled and the range is not completely covered by a
single MTRR but the memory type of the range is WB, even if covered by
multiple MTRRs.
Right?
So tell me this: why do we need to repeat that over those KVA helpers?
It's not like the callers can do anything about it, can they?
So maybe that comment - expanded into more detail - should be over
mtrr_type_lookup() only. That'll be better, methinks.
Hmm.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
