On 05/18/2015 01:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
>> >  siginfo_t *mpx_generate_siginfo(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> > -                          struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf);
>> > -int mpx_handle_bd_fault(struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf);
>> > +                          struct task_struct *tsk);
>> > +int mpx_handle_bd_fault(struct task_struct *tsk);
> So you still keep *tsk and remove it in the next patch. I guess either
> ordering has its value, so no problem to do it this way.

I agree that this looks a bit goofy.

Originally, this patch just passed around 'tsk' instead of 'xsave_buf'.
 But I realized we could go a step further.

The way it stands, it is bisectable and been built in this configuration
for a month or two.  I'd really like to keep it this way if possible,
even though it looks a bit goofy.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to