On 20/05/2015 22:41, Liang Li wrote:
> The MPX feature requires eager KVM FPU restore support. We have verified
> that MPX cannot work correctly with the current lazy KVM FPU restore
> mechanism. Eager KVM FPU restore should be enabled if the MPX feature is
> exposed to VM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liang Li <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c            | 4 ++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h            | 8 ++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              | 5 +++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 3 ++-
>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e61c3a4..4cb39d4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>       struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache mmu_page_header_cache;
>  
>       struct fpu guest_fpu;
> +     bool eager_fpu;
>       u64 xcr0;
>       u64 guest_supported_xcr0;
>       u32 guest_xstate_size;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 59b69f6..5ac5e4d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       if (best && (best->eax & (F(XSAVES) | F(XSAVEC))))
>               best->ebx = xstate_required_size(vcpu->arch.xcr0, true);
>  
> +     if (guest_cpuid_has_mpx(vcpu))
> +             vcpu->arch.eager_fpu = true;
> +     else
> +             vcpu->arch.eager_fpu = false;
>       /*
>        * The existing code assumes virtual address is 48-bit in the canonical
>        * address checks; exit if it is ever changed.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index c3b1ad9..496b369 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -117,4 +117,12 @@ static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_rtm(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu)
>       best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 7, 0);
>       return best && (best->ebx & bit(X86_FEATURE_RTM));
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_mpx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> +
> +     best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 7, 0);
> +     return best && (best->ebx & bit(X86_FEATURE_MPX));
> +}
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index f7b6168..7082151 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -8445,6 +8445,11 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm 
> *kvm, unsigned int id)
>                       goto free_vmcs;
>       }
>  
> +     /*
> +      * activate fpu here is okay, because it will be deactivated soon if the
> +      * lazy fpu restore mode is used.
> +      */
> +     vmx_fpu_activate(&vmx->vcpu);
>       return &vmx->vcpu;
>  
>  free_vmcs:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 5f38188..4d9f8e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7060,7 +7060,8 @@ void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       fpu_save_init(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
>       __kernel_fpu_end();
>       ++vcpu->stat.fpu_reload;
> -     kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
> +     if (!vcpu->arch.eager_fpu)
> +             kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_DEACTIVATE_FPU, vcpu);
>       trace_kvm_fpu(0);
>  }
>  
> 

Thanks, applied to kvm/master.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to