On Wed, 20 May 2015, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:26 PM > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248 > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; linux-arm- > > [email protected]; Lian Minghuan-B31939 > > Subject: Re: [RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should > > not be smaller than PSZ > > > > On Wed, 20 May 2015, Stuart Yoder wrote: > > > > > when allocating a device table, if the requested allocation > > > is smaller than the default granule size of the ITS > > > then, we need to round up to the default size > > > > > > > So who wrote that patch? That's not a valid SOB chain .... > > Minghuan wrote the original patch (v1,v2), making the functional change. > I wrote/added the comments and submitted v3, after discussing with > Minghuan. > > Given that, what is the correct signed-off-by chain?
From: Minghuan Lian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <[email protected]> [ Stuart: Added comments and massaged changelog] Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <[email protected]> So the authorship gets attributed to Minghuan and it's noticed in the changelog that you added comments and the changelog updates and then sent the patch. I'll apply it with that change, ok? Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
