Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask

[Steven Rostedt]

If this is indeed the way things should work. I'll go ahead and fix all
the other architectures.

-- Steve

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-git1/arch/ppc/kernel/signal.c.orig 2005-08-09 
17:00:43.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-git1/arch/ppc/kernel/signal.c      2005-08-09 
17:01:37.000000000 -0400
@@ -759,13 +759,12 @@ int do_signal(sigset_t *oldset, struct p
        else
                handle_signal(signr, &ka, &info, oldset, regs, newsp);
 
-       if (!(ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
-               spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-               sigorsets(&current->blocked,&current->blocked,&ka.sa.sa_mask);
+       spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+       sigorsets(&current->blocked,&current->blocked,&ka.sa.sa_mask);
+       if (!(ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
                sigaddset(&current->blocked, signr);
-               recalc_sigpending();
-               spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-       }
+       recalc_sigpending();
+       spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 
        return 1;
 }


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/