On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:02:59PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > What would a syntax look like which in your opinion does not remove > totally valid symlink targets for magic mushroom bullshit? Prefix with > // (which, according to POSIX, allows for implementation-defined > behaviour)? Something else, not allowed in a regular pathname?
None. just don't do it. Use bindmount, they're cheap and have sane defined semtantics. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
