On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:45 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Paul also insists that *there is no reason* to think that current logic > of the kconfig tools, as it is currently implemented, is flawed [2].
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/8/748 (It should be noted that Russell King taught me the approach I took there. Before Russell did that I found dependency errors involving recursive selects, ie most of them, rather baffling. Any flaws in that message are entirely mine, of course.) > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/18/835 "insist" is pushing things a bit too far. "claims" or "stated"? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
