Thomas, Daniel, Any opinion on that? Maybe this patch could go in as is?
On 16/01/2015 at 17:59:14 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote : > Hi, > > On 16/01/2015 at 10:20:14 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > > > + if (dev->suspend && dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED) > > > > I wonder if we should use > CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN > > (or CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED || CLOCK_EVT_MODE_SHUTDOWN) instead of > > !CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED. > > > > I'll let Thomas or Daniel decide :) But I'm open to that. > > >-- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
