> hum, so this is assuming that having cycles fort 1st entry > means there'll be for the rest? > Also in that case why is there the '!= cycles' check within > addr_map_symbol__account_cycles ? > It means there might be. It's just a short cut. But rarely branches may still have 0 cycles, so it still needs to be checked later.
In theory it could miss a valid one if the first happened to be zero, but that seems very unlikely. -Andi -- [email protected] -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
