On 05/28/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> 
> The CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START symbol is defined as 1 only if
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX is set, otherwise it is defined as 0.
> However, if CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX is set, the first (index 0)
> entry in the cpuidle driver's table of states is overwritten with
> the default "poll" entry by the core.  The "state" defined by the
> "poll" entry doesn't provide ->enter_dead and ->enter_freeze
> callbacks and its exit_latency is 0.
> 
> For this reason, it is not necessary to use CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START
> in cpuidle_play_dead() (->enter_dead is NULL, so the "poll state"
> will be skipped by the loop).
> 
> It also is arguably unuseful to return states with exit_latency
> equal to 0 from find_deepest_state(), so the function can be modified
> to start the loop from index 0 and the "poll state" will be skipped by
> it as a result of the check against latency_req.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ int cpuidle_play_dead(void)
>               return -ENODEV;
> 
>       /* Find lowest-power state that supports long-term idle */
> -     for (i = drv->state_count - 1; i >= CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i--)
> +     for (i = drv->state_count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
>               if (drv->states[i].enter_dead)
>                       return drv->states[i].enter_dead(dev, i);
> 
> @@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ static int find_deepest_state(struct cpu
>                             bool freeze)
>  {
>       unsigned int latency_req = 0;
> -     int i, ret = freeze ? -1 : CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START - 1;
> +     int i, ret = -ENXIO;
> 
> -     for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
>               struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
>               struct cpuidle_state_usage *su = &dev->states_usage[i];
> 

Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to