On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 01:27 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:21 am, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > Should there be any locking around this? Or should the value of > > rq->nr_running be saved to a local variable as in this untested patch? > > Very sneaky.. > > On initial inspection your patch makes complete sense. I see no point in > adding locking to this function as the accuracy is not critical. Want to give > your patch a run and then push it to akpm? Thanks!
Okay, I'm testing it now. It took running overnight to hit the problem before, so I'll let it run until tomorrow before I push it. > Cheers, > Con -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
