On 05/23/15 11:02, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capric...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capric...@gmail.com> >> --- >> kernel/user_namespace.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c >> index 4109f83..02a1197 100644 >> --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c >> +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c >> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ int create_user_ns(struct cred *new) >> /* >> * Verify that we can not violate the policy of which files >> * may be accessed that is specified by the root directory, >> - * by verifing that the root directory is at the root of the >> + * by verifying that the root directory is at the root of the >> * mount namespace which allows all files to be accessed. >> */ >> if (current_chrooted()) >> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static ssize_t map_write(struct file *file, const char >> __user *buf, >> * >> * There is a one time data dependency between reading the >> * count of the extents and the values of the extents. The >> - * desired behavior is to see the values of the extents that > ^^^^^^^^ In american englic behavior is a correct spelling. > I don't know why the brits throw in extraneous > letters.
and kernel documentation accepts either form of spelling. >> + * desired behaviour is to see the values of the extents that >> * were written before the count of the extents. >> * >> * To achieve this smp_wmb() is used on guarantee the write >> @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static ssize_t map_write(struct file *file, const char >> __user *buf, >> (next_line != NULL)) >> goto out; >> } >> - /* Be very certaint the new map actually exists */ >> + /* Be very certain the new map actually exists */ >> if (new_map.nr_extents == 0) >> goto out; >> >> @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static bool new_idmap_permitted(const struct file *file, >> >> /* Allow the specified ids if we have the appropriate capability >> * (CAP_SETUID or CAP_SETGID) over the parent user namespace. >> - * And the opener of the id file also had the approprpiate capability. >> + * And the opener of the id file also had the appropriate capability. >> */ >> if (ns_capable(ns->parent, cap_setid) && >> file_ns_capable(file, ns->parent, cap_setid)) > -- -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
