On Thu, 28 May 2015, Hyungwon Hwang wrote:

> Backlight device returns the result of update_status(), but
> backlight_update_status() ignores it. So the consumers cannot confirm the
> result of their function call. This patch makes the result to be returned
> back for consumers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <human.hw...@samsung.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/backlight.h | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Applied with Jingoo's Ack, thanks.

> diff --git a/include/linux/backlight.h b/include/linux/backlight.h
> index adb14a8..1e7a69a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/backlight.h
> +++ b/include/linux/backlight.h
> @@ -117,12 +117,16 @@ struct backlight_device {
>       int use_count;
>  };
>  
> -static inline void backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
> +static inline int backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bd)
>  {
> +     int ret = -ENOENT;
> +
>       mutex_lock(&bd->update_lock);
>       if (bd->ops && bd->ops->update_status)
> -             bd->ops->update_status(bd);
> +             ret = bd->ops->update_status(bd);
>       mutex_unlock(&bd->update_lock);
> +
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  extern struct backlight_device *backlight_device_register(const char *name,

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to