On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Shuah Khan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/01/2015 04:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Shuah Khan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 05/29/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> Test a couple of special cases in 32-bit kernels for entries from >>>> vm86 mode. This will OOPS both old kernels due to a bug and and >>>> 4.1-rc5 due to a regression I introduced, and it should make sure >>>> that the SYSENTER-from-vm86-mode hack in the kernel keeps working. >>>> >>>> Tests: 394838c96013 x86/asm/entry/32: Fix user_mode() misuses >>>> Tests: 7ba554b5ac69 x86/asm/entry/32: Really make user_mode() work >>>> correctly for VM86 mode >>>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Ingo, Shuah: I think this should go in through -tip. (In general, I think >>>> new x86 tests that don't have interesting interactions with the kselftest >>>> infrastructure should go in through -tip, especially tests such as this one >>>> that are related to recent regressions.) >>> >>> No problem going through tip. Could you please make sure >>> >>> "make kselftest" run from top level and >>> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh >>> >>> don't break? >> >> Both 'make kselftest -j12 TARGETS=x86' and >> ../../../tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh work for me. >> (The .. thing is annoying -- would it make sense to fix it to work >> from the kernel tree root?) >> > > What is annoying about it and how would it get solved by making it > run from the kernel tree root? >
I ran it from the kernel tree root and it told me to change my directory. I think it should have changed the directory itself :) --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
