В Вт, 02/06/2015 в 18:07 +0200, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:27:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:58 +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > > 01.06.2015, 17:13, "Peter Zijlstra" <[email protected]>:
> > 
> > > > @@ -1010,7 +1014,7 @@ static inline void check_class_changed(s
> > > >          if (prev_class != p->sched_class) {
> > > >                  if (prev_class->switched_from)
> > > >                          prev_class->switched_from(rq, p);
> > > > - /* Possble rq->lock 'hole'.  */
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > But switched_from_dl()->cancel_dl_timer() still unlocks rq->lock.
> > > 
> > > It seems we should drop it (cancel_dl_timer) and move hrtimer_cancel()
> > > from switched_from_dl() to finish_task_switch(). It will be executed
> > > for all classes and completely take the functionality we implement
> > > cancel_dl_timer() for.
> > 
> > *groan* yes.. I don't like moving it into generic code though.
> > 
> > more thinking required.
> 
> How about something like so then?
> 
> ---
> Subject: sched,deadline: Fix sched class hopping CBS hole
> 
> We still have a few pending issues with the deadline code, one of which
> is that switching between scheduling classes can 'leak' CBS state.
> 
> Close the hole by retaining the current CBS state when leaving
> SCHED_DEADLINE and unconditionally programming the deadline timer.
> 
> The timer will then reset the CBS state if the task is still
> !SCHED_DEADLINE by the time it hits.
> 
> If the task were to die, task_dead_dl() will cancel the timer, so no
> lingering state.
> 
> Cc: Luca Abeni <[email protected]>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 40767b0dc768 ("sched/deadline: Fix deadline parameter modification 
> handling")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 71 
> ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 7336fe5fea30..625ed74f1467 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -572,20 +572,26 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct 
> hrtimer *timer)
>       rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
>  
>       /*
> -      * We need to take care of several possible races here:
> -      *
> -      *   - the task might have changed its scheduling policy
> -      *     to something different than SCHED_DEADLINE
> -      *   - the task might have changed its reservation parameters
> -      *     (through sched_setattr())
> -      *   - the task might have been boosted by someone else and
> -      *     might be in the boosting/deboosting path
> -      *
> -      * In all this cases we bail out, as the task is already
> -      * in the runqueue or is going to be enqueued back anyway.
> +      * The task might have changed its scheduling policy to something
> +      * different than SCHED_DEADLINE (through switched_fromd_dl()).
>        */
> -     if (!dl_task(p) || dl_se->dl_new ||
> -         dl_se->dl_boosted || !dl_se->dl_throttled)
> +     if (!dl_task(p)) {
> +             __dl_clear_params(p);
> +             goto unlock;
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * There's only two ways to have dl_new set; 1) __sched_fork(), and a
> +      * fresh task should not have a pending timer, and 2) the above, which
> +      * does not get here.
> +      */
> +     WARN_ON_ONCE(dl_se->dl_new);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * The task might have been boosted by someone else and might be in the
> +      * boosting/deboosting path, its not throttled.
> +      */
> +     if (dl_se->dl_boosted || !dl_se->dl_throttled)
>               goto unlock;
>  
>       sched_clock_tick();
> @@ -1683,37 +1689,18 @@ void __init init_sched_dl_class(void)
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>  
> -/*
> - *  Ensure p's dl_timer is cancelled. May drop rq->lock for a while.
> - */
> -static void cancel_dl_timer(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> -{
> -     struct hrtimer *dl_timer = &p->dl.dl_timer;
> -
> -     /* Nobody will change task's class if pi_lock is held */
> -     lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
> -
> -     if (hrtimer_active(dl_timer)) {
> -             int ret = hrtimer_try_to_cancel(dl_timer);
> -
> -             if (unlikely(ret == -1)) {
> -                     /*
> -                      * Note, p may migrate OR new deadline tasks
> -                      * may appear in rq when we are unlocking it.
> -                      * A caller of us must be fine with that.
> -                      */
> -                     raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> -                     hrtimer_cancel(dl_timer);
> -                     raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> -             }
> -     }
> -}
> -
>  static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> -     /* XXX we should retain the bw until 0-lag */
> -     cancel_dl_timer(rq, p);
> -     __dl_clear_params(p);
> +     /*
> +      * Start the deadline timer; if we switch back to dl before this we'll
> +      * continue consuming our current CBS slice. If we stay outside of
> +      * SCHED_DEADLINE until the deadline passes, the timer will reset the
> +      * task.
> +      *
> +      * task_dead_dl() will cancel our timer if we happen to die while
> +      * its still pending.

task_dead_dl() is called for tasks of deadline class only. So if we do that,
the timer may be executed after final task's dead.

> +      */
> +     start_dl_timer(&p->dl, false);
>  
>       /*
>        * Since this might be the only -deadline task on the rq,
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to