On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Gregory Fong <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've now actually attempted to use the gpiolib irqchip code.  This
>> driver can't directly use gpiochip_irqchip_add() because of the
>> multiple gpiochip : one irqchip map.  At first, I thought it might be
>> possible to simply add a new argument (or break things into a helper
>> function) to allow setting the associated IRQ domain, but then I can't
>> use the generic map and unmap functions which expect the irq_domain
>> host_data member to be struct gpiochip *, which makes no sense in this
>> case.  That puts me right back to implementing a special version of
>> the map and unmap function.
>
> I see.
>

I think I was wrong, it isn't actually necessary to have a single
irq_chip as long as all of the IRQs use the same handler.  I have a
preliminary implementation doing that instead that seems to work fine.
Once I've had a chance to verify that it works in all cases, will post
that as v3.

Cheers,
Gregory
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to