On 2015年06月02日 17:35, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:12:53AM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org>
ARM64 ACPI based PCI host bridge init needs a arch dependent
struct pci_controller to accommodate common PCI host bridge
code which is introduced later, or it will lead to compile
errors on ARM64.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>
CC: Liviu Dudau <liviu.du...@arm.com>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang....@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
index b008a72f8bc0..70884957f253 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
@@ -10,6 +10,16 @@
#include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
#include <asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h>
+struct acpi_device;
+
+struct pci_controller {
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ struct acpi_device *companion; /* ACPI companion device */
+#endif
+ int segment; /* PCI domain */
+ int node; /* NUMA node */
+};
There is nothing ARM64 specific in this structure. The only
reason I see you want to keep it arch specific is the iommu
pointer on x86,
And also plarform_data for IA64 too.
but I think we should find a way to make
the common bits shared across archs (ie the struct above) and
add (maybe a void*) to the generic struct to cater for arch
specific data.
Thoughts ?
We discussed this already, it has limitations to make it
common to all archs, I think the limitation are:
- struct pci_controller are also used for other archs
such as PowerPC and Tile, they will not use it for
ACPI purpose, so we can not used for all archs.
- if we let struct pci_controller defined only for archs
using ACPI, such as introduce it in linux/acpi.h, we still
can not satisfy that the struct pci_controller is not
only used for ACPI case on x86, it will be used for
non-ACPI too.
So it's pretty difficult to share it with across archs to me,
any more ideas?
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
