Sorry this reply was to go to the whole list but only made it to Matt. The e1000_intr() routine already calls e1000_clean_tx_irq(). So what's the point of this patch? Am I missing something?
On 8/11/05, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suggested by Steven Rostedt, matches his patch included in e100. > > Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Index: l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > =================================================================== > --- l.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c 2005-08-06 17:36:32.000000000 > -0500 > +++ l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c 2005-08-06 17:55:01.000000000 -0500 > @@ -3789,6 +3789,7 @@ e1000_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev) > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > disable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq); > e1000_intr(adapter->pdev->irq, netdev, NULL); > + e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter); > enable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq); > } > #endif > > -- Cheers, John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
