If the cpumask is changed, it is possible that only a part of the per-node
pwq is affected.  This can happen when the user changes the cpumask of
a workqueue or the low level cpumask.

So we try to reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs are unchanged.

In wq_update_unbound_numa(), we had already made the current pwq be
reused when its attrs are unaffected, but we move the code of fetching
current pwq closer to the code of testing.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 6aa9bd5..197520b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3516,6 +3516,7 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 {
        struct apply_wqattrs_ctx *ctx;
        struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs, *tmp_attrs;
+       struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
        int node;
 
        lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
@@ -3556,9 +3557,16 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 
        for_each_node(node) {
                if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(new_attrs, node, -1, 
tmp_attrs->cpumask)) {
-                       ctx->pwq_tbl[node] = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, tmp_attrs);
-                       if (!ctx->pwq_tbl[node])
-                               goto out_free;
+                       /* Try to reuse the current one */
+                       pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node);
+                       if (pwq && wqattrs_equal(tmp_attrs, pwq->pool->attrs)) {
+                               get_pwq_unlocked(pwq);
+                       } else {
+                               pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, tmp_attrs);
+                               if (!pwq)
+                                       goto out_free;
+                       }
+                       ctx->pwq_tbl[node] = pwq;
                } else {
                        ctx->dfl_pwq->refcnt++;
                        ctx->pwq_tbl[node] = ctx->dfl_pwq;
@@ -3717,7 +3725,6 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct 
workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
        cpumask = target_attrs->cpumask;
 
        copy_workqueue_attrs(target_attrs, wq->unbound_attrs);
-       pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node);
 
        /*
         * Let's determine what needs to be done.  If the target cpumask is
@@ -3726,6 +3733,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct 
workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
         * equals the default pwq's, the default pwq should be used.
         */
        if (wq_calc_node_cpumask(wq->dfl_pwq->pool->attrs, node, cpu_off, 
cpumask)) {
+               pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node);
                if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask))
                        return;
        } else {
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to