* H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 11:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:41:48PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> This header containing all MSRs and respective bit definitions got
> >> exported to userspace in conjunction with the big uapi shuffle.
> >>
> >> But, it doesn't have anything to do in the uapi headers because
> >> userspace can do its own MSR defines and exporting them from the
> >> kernel blocks us from doing cleanups/renames in that header. Which is
> >> ridiculous - it is not kernel's job to export such a header and keep
> >> MSRs list and their names stable.
> >
> > Here's v2. Needed to *not* include it into uapi/asm/msr.h either.
>
> I really like the patch, but the description is awful.
>
> How about: "x86/uapi: <asm/msr.h> is not a UAPI"
So a small nit: a simple statement of fact is not really a proper commit title.
A commit title should express what the patch _does_.
Missing leading verbs are really passive-aggressive on the reader of a flow of
commit titles - such as when reading a short log or a one-line git log.
Something like:
x86/uapi: Remove <asm/msr.h> from the list of exported UAPI headers
or so would work fine with me.
Thanks!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
