On 05/22, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>

Are you using this include?

> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>

Are you using this include?

> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>

Are you using this include?

> +
> +static long clk_apb_mul_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +                                unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +     struct clk_apb_mul *am = to_clk_apb_mul(hw);
> +     unsigned long mult = 1;
> +
> +     if (readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_CFGR) & BIT(am->bit_idx))
> +             mult *= 2;

Isn't this the same as mult = 2? I guess we could rely on the
compiler to figure out this one.

> +
> +     if (__clk_get_flags(hw->clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> +             unsigned long best_parent = rate / mult;
> +
> +             *prate =
> +                 __clk_round_rate(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk), best_parent);
> +     }
> +
> +     return *prate * mult;
> +}
> +
> +static int clk_apb_mul_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +                              unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{

Why don't we need to do anything here?

> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct clk_ops clk_apb_mul_factor_ops = {

const?

> +     .round_rate = clk_apb_mul_round_rate,
> +     .set_rate = clk_apb_mul_set_rate,
> +     .recalc_rate = clk_apb_mul_recalc_rate,
> +};
> +
> +struct clk *clk_register_apb_mul(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> +                              const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags,
> +                              u8 bit_idx)
> +{
> +     struct clk_apb_mul *am;
> +     struct clk_init_data init;
> +     struct clk *clk;
> +
> +     am = kzalloc(sizeof(*am), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!am)
> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +     am->bit_idx = bit_idx;
> +     am->hw.init = &init;
> +
> +     init.name = name;
> +     init.ops = &clk_apb_mul_factor_ops;
> +     init.flags = flags | CLK_IS_BASIC;

Is it basic?

> +     init.parent_names = &parent_name;
> +     init.num_parents = 1;
> +
> +     clk = clk_register(dev, &am->hw);
> +
> +     if (IS_ERR(clk))
> +             kfree(am);
> +
> +     return clk;
> +}
> +
> +static const char __initdata *sys_parents[] =   { "hsi", NULL, "pll" };

__initdata goes after the []

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to