On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > Employ the new lockdep lock pinning annotation to ensure no > > 'accidental' lock-breaks happen with rq->lock. > > btw., could we perhaps reorder this series a bit and first see that it > properly > detects the original locking bug, and then only fix the bug? > > To make sure the pinning infrastructure works and all that.
It works; I've had plenty explosions while trying to get some of the less obvious code paths sorted. I've managed to hit every single WARN I added ;-) Also, for bisection it might be annoying to hit known bad points, which is why its ordered this way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
