On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:06:35PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Friday 29 May 2015 03:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >The problem will be there when external controller use the DVS pin for DVFS > >and need two register address here. In this case, I think external > >controller need to get information from different mechanism rather than via > >regulator driver to avoid complication on regulator driver/framework. > >Probably, it's definitely getting complicated (though in this case where > >we only need one register we ought to be more able to manage it, not > >that I have bright ideas right now).
> Are you accepting this patch? I am not much clear on the conclusion and > hence my question is. > Is anything pending from me to provide any information? I thought we agreed that this interface was a bad idea due to the need to coordinate between the changes in register and the external device using the value?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
