On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd > fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
They were. > * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke" I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug with the base kernel as an example. > > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a > > WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was), > > This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI > drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE. Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/