On 06/09/2015 08:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Before this patch, we were clearing pt_regs->r8..r11 on stack.
>> We can as well just store actual r8..r11 registers there:
>> they came from userspace, we leak no information by showing them to ptrace.
>> This allows to get rid of one insn ("xor %eax,%eax").
>> Not a big deal, but still...
>>
>> After call to syscall_trace_enter(), before this patch we were restoring
>> clobbered registers and jump to code which converts 32-bit syscall
>> ABI to 64-bit C ABI. This is unnecessary work, we can combine both
>> steps into one (similar to what audit code does already).
>
> I think like zeroing it better. There's nothing wrong with zeroing
> it,
Yes, there is nothing wrong with zeroing. It just requires a bit
more code.
> and it makes testing (if we ever started testing this stuff)
> easier, I think.
Currently, we don't zero *all* high regs, only r8..10. (r11 is
nonzero due to SYSRET ABI; r12..15 are preserved by virtue of being
callee-saved regs).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
