On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:51:17PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/fs/exec.c  2005-08-11 
> > 11:44:55.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/fs/exec.c      
> > 2005-08-11 12:26:45.000000000 -0700
> > [ ... snip ... ]
> > @@ -785,11 +787,13 @@ no_thread_group:
> >             recalc_sigpending();
> > 
> > +           oldsighand->deleted = 1;
> > +           oldsighand->successor = newsighand;
> 
> I don't think this is correct.
> 
> This ->oldsighand can be shared with another CLONE_SIGHAND
> process and will not be deleted, just unshared.
> 
> When the signal is sent to that process we must use ->oldsighand
> for locking, not the oldsighand->successor == newsighand.

OK, the attached instead revalidates that the task struct still references
the sighand_struct after obtaining the lock (and passes kernbench and
LTP, which tells me I need to get better tests!).  However, your quick
responses motivated me to read more of the code (yes, I know, I should
have done -that- beforehand!!!), and there are some remaining problems
that I need to sort out, including:

o       Fatal signals affect all threads in a process, and the
        existing code looks like it assumes that tasklist_lock
        is held during delivery of such signals.  In this patch,
        that assumption does not hold.

o       Some of the functions invoked by __group_send_sig_info(),
        including handle_stop_signal(), momentarily drop ->siglock.

I will be looking at a few approaches to handle these situations, but,
in the meantime, any other combinations that I missed?

                                                        Thanx, Paul


diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/fs/exec.c 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/fs/exec.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/fs/exec.c      2005-08-11 
11:44:55.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/fs/exec.c  
2005-08-12 21:18:33.000000000 -0700
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ no_thread_group:
                write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
                if (atomic_dec_and_test(&oldsighand->count))
-                       kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, oldsighand);
+                       sighand_free(oldsighand);
        }
 
        BUG_ON(!thread_group_empty(current));
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/include/linux/sched.h 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/include/linux/sched.h
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/include/linux/sched.h  
2005-08-11 11:44:57.000000000 -0700
+++ 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/include/linux/sched.h  
    2005-08-12 21:19:34.000000000 -0700
@@ -450,8 +450,16 @@ struct sighand_struct {
        atomic_t                count;
        struct k_sigaction      action[_NSIG];
        spinlock_t              siglock;
+       struct rcu_head         rcu;
 };
 
+static inline void sighand_free(struct sighand_struct *sp)
+{
+       extern void sighand_free_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp);
+
+       call_rcu(&sp->rcu, sighand_free_cb);
+}
+
 /*
  * NOTE! "signal_struct" does not have it's own
  * locking, because a shared signal_struct always
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/fork.c 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/fork.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/fork.c  2005-08-11 
11:44:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/fork.c      
2005-08-12 21:24:00.000000000 -0700
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include <linux/acct.h>
 #include <linux/kthread.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
@@ -769,6 +770,14 @@ int unshare_files(void)
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unshare_files);
 
+void sighand_free_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+       struct sighand_struct *sp =
+               container_of(rhp, struct sighand_struct, rcu);
+
+       kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, sp);
+}
+
 static inline int copy_sighand(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct * 
tsk)
 {
        struct sighand_struct *sig;
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/signal.c 
linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01/kernel/signal.c        
2005-08-11 11:44:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-realtime-preempt-V0.7.53-01-tasklistRCU/kernel/signal.c    
2005-08-14 19:53:28.000000000 -0700
@@ -328,9 +328,11 @@ void __exit_sighand(struct task_struct *
        struct sighand_struct * sighand = tsk->sighand;
 
        /* Ok, we're done with the signal handlers */
+       spin_lock(&sighand->siglock);
        tsk->sighand = NULL;
        if (atomic_dec_and_test(&sighand->count))
-               kmem_cache_free(sighand_cachep, sighand);
+               sighand_free(sighand);
+       spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
 }
 
 void exit_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -1150,16 +1152,23 @@ void zap_other_threads(struct task_struc
 int group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
+       struct sighand_struct *sp;
        int ret;
 
+retry:
        ret = check_kill_permission(sig, info, p);
-       if (!ret && sig && p->sighand) {
+       if (!ret && sig && (sp = p->sighand)) {
                if (!get_task_struct_rcu(p)) {
                        return -ESRCH;
                }
-               spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
+               spin_lock_irqsave(&sp->siglock, flags);
+               if (p->sighand != sp) {
+                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->siglock, flags);
+                       put_task_struct(p);
+                       goto retry;
+               }
                ret = __group_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sp->siglock, flags);
                put_task_struct(p);
        }
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to