Hello Chanho,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 06/10/2015 03:40 PM, Chanho Park wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>> The Exynos interrupt combiner IP looses its state when the SoC enters
>> into a low power state during a Suspend-to-RAM. This means that if a
>> IRQ is used as a source, the interrupts for the devices are disabled
>> when the system is resumed from a sleep state so are not triggered.
>>
>> Save the interrupt enable set register for each combiner group and
>> restore it after resume to make sure that the interrupts are enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk>
>> ---
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed this issue because after a S2R, IRQs for some devices didn't
>> trigger anymore but others continued working and all of them had lines
>> from a GPIO chip as their interrupt source.
>>
>> The only difference was that the GPIO pins that were not working after
>> a resume, were the ones that had the interrupt combiner as interrupt
>> parent.
>>
>> With this patch now all perhiperals are working correctly after a resume.
>> Tested on an Exynos5250 Snow, Exynos5420 Peach Pit and Exynos5800 Peach Pi
>> Chromebooks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Javier
>>
>> drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c | 61
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
>> index 5945223b73fa..69c710641bfa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> @@ -34,9 +35,14 @@ struct combiner_chip_data {
>> unsigned int irq_mask;
>> void __iomem *base;
>> unsigned int parent_irq;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> + u32 pm_save;
>> +#endif
>> };
>>
>> +static struct combiner_chip_data *combiner_data;
>> static struct irq_domain *combiner_irq_domain;
>> +static unsigned int max_nr = 20;
>>
>> static inline void __iomem *combiner_base(struct irq_data *data)
>> {
>> @@ -170,12 +176,10 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops combiner_irq_domain_ops =
>> {
>> };
>>
>> static void __init combiner_init(void __iomem *combiner_base,
>> - struct device_node *np,
>> - unsigned int max_nr)
>> + struct device_node *np)
>> {
>> int i, irq;
>> unsigned int nr_irq;
>> - struct combiner_chip_data *combiner_data;
>>
>> nr_irq = max_nr * IRQ_IN_COMBINER;
>>
>> @@ -201,11 +205,56 @@ static void __init combiner_init(void __iomem
>> *combiner_base,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * combiner_suspend - save interrupt combiner state before suspend
>> + *
>> + * Save the interrupt enable set register for all combiner groups since
>> + * the state is lost when the system enters into a sleep state.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static int combiner_suspend(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < max_nr; i++)
>> + combiner_data[i].pm_save =
>> + __raw_readl(combiner_data[i].base +
>> COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * combiner_resume - restore interrupt combiner state after resume
>> + *
>> + * Restore the interrupt enable set register for all combiner groups since
>> + * the state is lost when the system enters into a sleep state on suspend.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +static void combiner_resume(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < max_nr; i++)
>
> Don't you need to clear masking bits of the COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR
> before enabling the bits?
>
I thought that was not needed since the enable bits are all cleared to 0
(default reset value) after a suspend.
But I can add the following if you think that it is needed or more safe:
/* Disable all interrupts */
__raw_writel(combiner_data[i].irq_mask,
combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_CLEAR);
>> + __raw_writel(combiner_data[i].pm_save,
>> + combiner_data[i].base + COMBINER_ENABLE_SET);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#else
>> +#define combiner_suspend NULL
>> +#define combiner_resume NULL
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static struct syscore_ops combiner_syscore_ops = {
>> + .suspend = combiner_suspend,
>> + .resume = combiner_resume,
>> +};
>> +
>> static int __init combiner_of_init(struct device_node *np,
>> struct device_node *parent)
>> {
>> void __iomem *combiner_base;
>> - unsigned int max_nr = 20;
>>
>> combiner_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
>> if (!combiner_base) {
>> @@ -219,7 +268,9 @@ static int __init combiner_of_init(struct device_node
>> *np,
>> __func__, max_nr);
>> }
>>
>> - combiner_init(combiner_base, np, max_nr);
>> + combiner_init(combiner_base, np);
>> +
>> + register_syscore_ops(&combiner_syscore_ops);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
