On 06/10, Daniel Thompson wrote: > Currently it is not made explicit why clk_fixed_set_rate() can ignore > its arguments and unconditionally return success. Add a comment > to explain this. > > We also mark the clk_ops table const since it should never be > modified at runtime. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> > ---
Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
