Hi Grant,
> On Jun 7, 2015, at 14:16 , Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:30:28 +0300
> , Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi Wolfram,
>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 16:27 , Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Pantelis,
>>>
>>> thanks for your prompt reply. Unfortunately, I had to wait until I could
>>> access the test system again.
>>>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Sorry for the non-prompt reply; but just for kicks, can you try the attached
>> patch?
>>
>> I have a hunch this might be the problem.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> — Pantelis
>>
>>
>
> I played around with this some today. If I'm reading it correctly, the
> following patch reproduces the same problem:
>
> (continued below patch)
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> index 18016341d5a9..0a27b38c3041 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> @@ -753,6 +753,11 @@ static void __init of_unittest_match_node(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static struct resource test_bus_res = {
> + .start = 0xfffffff8,
> + .end = 0xfffffff9,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +};
> static const struct platform_device_info test_bus_info = {
> .name = "unittest-bus",
> };
> @@ -795,6 +800,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_platform_populate(void)
> if (rc)
> return;
> test_bus->dev.of_node = np;
> + platform_device_add_resources(test_bus, &test_bus_res, 1);
>
> of_platform_populate(np, match, NULL, &test_bus->dev);
> for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
>
> ---
>
> I think the fixup patch boils down to the following. It's hard to tell
> because it combines refactoring with the bug fix. Do I have it correct?
> If so, I'd rather commit the simple fix which can be committed now for
> v4.1, and the refactoring can be pushed for v4.2
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index ebf034b97278..b3042e6ee3ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *r = &pdev->resource[i];
> unsigned long type = resource_type(r);
>
> - if (type == IORESOURCE_MEM || type == IORESOURCE_IO)
> + if (r->parent)
> release_resource(r);
> }
>
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ void platform_device_del(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *r = &pdev->resource[i];
> unsigned long type = resource_type(r);
>
> - if (type == IORESOURCE_MEM || type == IORESOURCE_IO)
> + if (r->parent)
> release_resource(r);
> }
> }
>
Verified. No crashes.
Acked-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
