On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com> wrote:
> MWAITX can enable a timer and a corresponding timer value specified in SW
> P0 clocks. The SW P0 frequency is the same with TSC. The timer provides an
> upper bound on how long the instruction waits before exiting.
>
> The implementation of delay function in kernel can lerverage the timer of
> MWAITX. This patch provides a new method (delay_mwaitx) to measure delay
> time.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/x86/lib/delay.c         | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> index ece8048..9b41580 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
>  #define CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK     0x2
>
>  #define MWAIT_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK      0x1
> +#define MWAITX_ECX_TIMER_ENABLE                BIT(1)
> +#define MWAITX_MAX_LOOPS               ((u32)-1)
>
>  static inline void __monitor(const void *eax, unsigned long ecx,
>                              unsigned long edx)
> @@ -80,4 +82,13 @@ static inline void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long 
> eax, unsigned long ecx)
>         current_clr_polling();
>  }
>
> +static inline void mwaitx(unsigned long eax, unsigned long loops,
> +                         bool enable)
> +{
> +       if (enable)
> +               __mwaitx(eax, loops, MWAITX_ECX_TIMER_ENABLE);
> +       else
> +               __mwaitx(eax, 0, 0);
> +}

What's the purpose of the "enable" parameter?

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to