On 06/11/2015 04:33 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > Ugh I'm sorry, I've been running tests trying to get the numbers to look > good when I noticed I was getting some inconsistencies in my results. > Turns out I never actually tested your patch just plain, I had been > testing it with BALANCE_WAKE, because I was under the assumption that > was what was best for our workload. Since then I had fixed all of our > scripts and such and noticed that it actually super duper sucks for us. > So testing with this original patch everything is significantly better > (this is with the default SD flags set, no changes at all). > > So now that I've wasted a good bit of my time and everybody elses, can > we go about pushing this patch upstream? If you are happy with it the > way it is I'll go ahead and pull it into our kernels and just watch to > make sure it ends upstream at some point. Thanks,
FWIW, Jirka has run some tests with the patch as well, and seen significant performance improvements on various tests, on various systems. Merging the patch makes perfect sense to me. Acked-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
