* Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> So if wakeup_pmode_return is really the first thing called then the whole 
> >> premise of shadow descriptor corruption goes out the window: we reload all 
> >> relevant segment registers.
> >
> > True, but it still leaves the fact that we're loading __KERNEL_DS instead 
> > of 
> > __USER_DS, right?  So we end up in the kernel in some context (I have no 
> > clue 
> > what context) with __KERNEL_DS loaded.  It's very easy for us to 
> > inadvertently 
> > fix it: we could return to userspace by any means whatsoever except 
> > SYSEXIT, 
> > or we could even return back to some preempted kernel context.
> >
> > I still think we should replace __KERNEL_DS with __USER_DS in 
> > wakeup_pmode_return and see if the problem goes away.
> 
> I'm pretty sure that's what the problem is.  If you look at the sysexit path, 
> it 
> never reloads ds/es.  It assumes they are still __USER_DS set at sysenter.  
> The 
> iret path does restore all the user segments.

Ok, so something like the patch below, right?

Thanks,

        Ingo

=====================>
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
index 665c6b7d2ea9..7302bbaea184 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
@@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_pmode_return)
 wakeup_pmode_return:
        movw    $__KERNEL_DS, %ax
        movw    %ax, %ss
-       movw    %ax, %ds
-       movw    %ax, %es
        movw    %ax, %fs
        movw    %ax, %gs
 
+       movw    $__KERNEL_DS, %ax
+       movw    %ax, %ds
+       movw    %ax, %es
+
        # reload the gdt, as we need the full 32 bit address
        lidt    saved_idt
        lldt    saved_ldt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to