On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 07:45:00PM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Hi Mika,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:50:28PM -0300, lucas.de.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>       clk_prepare_enable(i_dev->clk);
> >>
> >>       if (!i_dev->pm_runtime_disabled)
> >> -             i2c_dw_init(i_dev);
> >> +             i2c_dw_enable(i_dev);
> >
> > This will not work if the device power gets removed (for example being
> > put to D3cold) as it looses context.
> 
> Do you mean we should keep the i2c_dw_init() here?

Yes, that's safer if the controller power gets removed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to