* Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > This is separate for ease of bisection. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 68 > > +++++------------------------------------------ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S > > index 33acc3dcc281..a5044d7a9d43 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S > > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S > > @@ -229,6 +229,11 @@ entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath: > > */ > > USERGS_SYSRET64 > > > > +GLOBAL(int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off) > > + TRACE_IRQS_ON > > + ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE) > > + jmp int_ret_from_sys_call > > Any reason why irq state tracking cannot be done in C as well, like the rest > of > the irq state tracking code?
Never mind, I see you've done exactly that in patch #12. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/