On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > mempool_destroy() does not tolerate a NULL mempool_t pointer > argument and performs a NULL-pointer dereference. This requires > additional attention and effort from developers/reviewers and > forces all mempool_destroy() callers to do a NULL check > > if (pool) > mempool_destroy(pool); > > Or, otherwise, be invalid mempool_destroy() users. > > Tweak mempool_destroy() and NULL-check the pointer there. > > Proposed by Andrew Morton. > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com> > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > LKML-reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/8/583
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> I like how your patch series is enabling us to remove many lines from the source code. But doing s/Reported-by/Suggested-by/ can also make your changelog two lines shorter ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
