On 06/18/2015 12:41 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > * Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> [2015-06-18 12:06:49]: > >>>> >>> >>> Overall this patch does seem to produce better results. However numa02 >>> gets affected -vely. >> >> OK, that is kind of expected. >> >> The way numa02 runs means that we are essentially guaranteed >> that, on a two node system, both nodes end up in the numa_group's >> active_mask. >> > > Just to add this was on a 4 node machine.
OK, so we are looking at two multi-threaded processes on a 4 node system, and waiting for them to converge? It may make sense to add my patch in with your patch 1/4 from last week, as well as the correct part of your patch 4/4, and see how they all work together. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
