On 03/06/15 19:23, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jun 2015, Adrian Hunter wrote: > >> On 03/06/15 06:30, Andi Kleen wrote: >>>> Then the changelog should say that I think. The current text says >>>> "Fast TSC calibration will always fail", which, to me, suggests that >>>> either the slow calibration will work or that the changelog message >>>> should be changed. >>> >>> Ok. No, the slow calibration works I believe. >> >> Yeah, so the (only?) downside is the 50ms wasted on Fast TSC >> calibration. What about this? > > I'm certainly happy to apply this one.
George Spelvin began investigating improving quick_pit_calibrate() but Ingo anyway suggested this patch as the first, so can this be applied? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
