On 06/23/2015 09:16 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
Thanks for your timely review Viresh.
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 22-06-15, 16:43, Lee Jones wrote:
+config ARM_ST_CPUFREQ
+ bool "ST CPUFreq support"
Isn't using ST just too generic? There are multiple SoCs ST has been
involved with, I have worked on a completely different series.
Probably a more relative string is required here, like stih407 ?
This is ST's only CPUFreq implementation and is pretty board
agnostic. This particular driver only currently supports the STiH407
family, but internally it supports some others too. I'll have a chat
and see if we can make it more specific somehow.
I think you can use STI instead.
Regards,
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
