On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:12:40AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >> Is that an acked-by for this cycle with a request to go deeper for 4.3? > > I wouldn't really expect something this wide reaching to be picked up > for this cycle, but if you manage to get it in: > > Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Thanks, definitely a long shot at this point, but this is what one gets for fixing rather than working around broken base infrastructure. It would be unfortunate if we went another cycle with pmem having both poor performance and broken persistence guarantees. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
