On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:28 pm, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > here are interbench v0.29 resoults: > > The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting. > > Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with > default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms > max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs > horribly.
The compile load is not a real compile load; it is an extreme exaggeration of what happens during a compile and this is done to increase the sensitivity of this test. It is _not_ worth trying to get a perfect score in this. > I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the > 2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference. Well of course it helps X - but then any X load totally fscks up audio on mainline and staircase which is why it's recommended not to renice it. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
