From: Markus Elfring <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:00:11 +0200
The omap_device_delete() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email protected]> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c index 4cb8fd9..196366e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c @@ -193,8 +193,7 @@ static int _omap_device_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, switch (event) { case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE: - if (pdev->archdata.od) - omap_device_delete(pdev->archdata.od); + omap_device_delete(pdev->archdata.od); break; case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE: if (pdev->dev.of_node) -- 2.4.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
