On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:34:37AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:29:13AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > 4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me >> >> > know. >> >> >> >> The commit to be backported is already reverted in upstream, and I just >> >> got an email from you backporting the revert as well... would be best to >> >> *not* backport either of these: >> >> >> >> commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5 >> >> Author: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> >> >> Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300 >> >> >> >> drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty >> >> >> >> commit 245ec9d85696c3e539b23e210f248698b478379c >> >> Author: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> >> >> Date: Mon Jun 15 12:59:37 2015 +0300 >> >> >> >> Revert "drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is >> >> empty" >> >> >> >> I only marked the revert cc: stable because the original was too. >> > >> > This patch is now in 4.0 so what do I suggest I do? Just take these as >> > well? >> > >> > confused, >> >> Sorry for confusing you. Please take neither or take both. > > So, based on what I have queued up, and what is already released in > 4.0-stable, we should be fine, right?
Yes. Thanks. Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
